The 2004 Presidential Election Was Manipulated
Overwhelming Evidence
All across the country there were thousands of voting "irregularities,"
like exaggerated vote totals and reported results that were a statistical impossibility.
The reported election results have been analyzed by many of the best statisticians in the
business and they have all come to the same conclusion, the chances of the reported 2004
election results being accurate are so small as to be virtually impossible. Various
studies have put the odds at hundreds of thousands to one or even millions to one. Several
studies have also found convincing evidence of widespread and systematic manipulation of
the vote totals.
Let's put it this way, the chances that Bush won the 2004
election fair and square are about the same as the chances that he'll be struck by
lightning while you're reading this.
There is also strong evidence that voting machine
manufacturers deliberately rigged their machines to report more votes for Bush. One even
promised to deliver the election to Bush. Isn't it odd that their machines then reported
vote totals for Bush that exceeded the total number of voters? If 1,000 people voted in a
precinct it's impossible for Bush to receive 1,200 votes, yet "mistakes" like
that repeatedly occurred across the country.
See the links below for more details.
The Mysterious Death of Raymond
Lemme - March 2005
Raymond
Lemme, a member of the Florida Inspector General's office, was investigating charges that
a Republican representative had requested vote-rigging software for electronic voting
machines. He reportedly found evidence of corruption that went "all the way to the
top," but never got a chance to present that evidence. He was found dead in a hotel
bathtub. Was it suicide, or did someone want to stop Mr. Lemme from talking about what he
had discovered? Read more.
Ten
preliminary reasons why the Bush vote does not compute, and why Congress must investigate
rather than certify the Electoral College
The "Crime
of November 2": The human side of how Bush stole Ohio, and why Congress
must investigate rather than ratify the Electoral College
Scientific
Analysis Suggests Presidential Vote Counts May Have Been Altered
Prominent
Statisticians Refute 'Explanation' of 2004 U.S. Exit Poll Discrepancies in New
Edison/Mitofsky Report and Urge Investigation of U.S. Presidential Election Results
The 2004
Presidential Election: Who Won The Popular Vote? An Examination of the Comparative
Validity of Exit Poll and Vote Count Data
Introduction:
Did George W. Bush steal America's 2004 election?
Kerry
votes switched to Bush and ballots pre-punched for Bush
Optical
scan machines hacked in Florida
Demand Change!
Contact Your Representatives
Contact your representatives in Congress and ask them to support a full
investigation into the 2004 election problems, and the establishment of uniform,
verifiable, independent voting standards.
Our Democracy is at Stake
When a political party can easily manipulate the voting process and alter
the reported vote totals, the sanctity of your vote has been violated. Fair and accurate
voting is the very foundation of democracy, don't wait until it's too late!
More to come, including:
The People Have Spoken, But What Did They Say?
A look at what people really voted for (and against) when they voted for
Bush. |